Skip to main content

Grief in Community

They say "grief is a funny thing." While sometimes funny things happen as part of the grief process, I'm not sure I buy into this saying. 

Recently, a colleague died unexpectedly, leaving behind a partner, two adult kids and countless friends, colleagues and others. Many people are in shock and grieving the surprise of this person's death. Others are feeling some relief and PTSD as their lived experience of this person has been different from others. Watching the social media posts roll in and seeing people go at it in the comments breaks my heart a bit. Most of the comments have been about sorrow and how good this person was. Other people have chosen not to share anything and a few have expressed that they feel a relief or even sorrow because this person is not going to be held accountable for their actions against them. And people are attacking those who have not had positive experiences with this individual.

As someone who has attended hundreds of deaths and officiated countless funerals, community needs to recognize that people are multifaceted. While some see a person as a saint, others see them as a sinner. We all carry and live into this duality - we will never be all things to all people, nor should we try. 

No matter how good of a life we live, someone will probably think we were awful. Mother Teresa and the Pope have plenty of people who believe they are awful people and did/doing the wrong things. If those two can't escape this duality, I don't have much hope for me or you. And to be honest, there are just some people that just were not great people and it's okay to call a spade a spade. 

What I do know is that people's feelings are not right or wrong. How you choose to express those feelings can be when you hurt yourself or others. Feelings are just that - feelings. Using social media to attack another person who shared their feelings about how they feel about a person or an event is not helpful. Even the best of intentions can be misconstrued. I know people want to honor those who have died. You get to do that for yourself. You don't get to control if others do that. You don't get to gaslight people into your narrative of a person. Two or more experiences of a person can and do exist. 

So please beloved, be compassionate enough to allow people to have their feelings about people. If you don't agree, acknowledge the disagreement and move on. You don't have to dwell on the difference. You don't have to affirm it. What you can do is say that someone else has a different lived experience from yours and move on. Don't start comment section wars on social media. Don't try to argue that they're wrong and you're right. You take your memories and feelings and let the others have theirs. 

Please remember to be loving in community when times of grief arise. There is room for us all. Take what you need and let go of what you don't during these times.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Political vs. Partisan in Preaching

For years now, I have heard in preaching and clergy circles about being political in sermons; the good, the bad and those who state that church shouldn’t be political. There are workshops, books, and podcasts talking about politics in the church with a variety of opinions. What do people mean when they make the statement that the church shouldn’t be political? The IRS has the most say about the rules for the separation of church and state/politics. If your church wants to be tax exempt, there are rules: don’t endorse any candidate or party, if you allow one party to use your space, other political parties also must be allowed to use the space, etc. The UCC’s general counsel, Heather Kimmell, has a webinar on this topic if you’d like to hear a more detailed explanation which can be found on the UCC’s YouTube channel. Churches have gotten “creative” in how to get around this, often partnering with another non-profit group to give support to a particular group. The UCC is proud to claim...

A Day in the Life: A Minister and Forgiveness

 I shared in one of my last blogs that I had complaints lodged against me by a small group in my congregation. Most seem to have moved on after our group meeting, where I apologized for a lot of things - probably more then I should have had too. But I'm the professional in those settings so I did it.  I'm not being told, second hand, that two of those in that meeting want a one on one apology from me because what I said in the meeting wasn't good enough. This is the couple who cursed in my church, have flat out lied about me and have repeatedly stated that the only outcome they're willing to accept is my termination.  Let me explain why I won't be having a one on one meeting with this couple and I won't be giving any more apologies. First, lets start with the apology part. I have apologized for my actions - maybe my misinterpretations is a better term. Based off of their actions and words, I communicated with the proper board/committee and asked for consensus ab...

The Okayist Pastor - Weekly Reflection 6/13/25

The things - the things. As I try to think of how I want to start this post I'm stuck on the words "the things..." Yesterday I had a member come talk to me, who was talking to me on behalf of another member, who had apparently called the vice moderator of the congregation. That's a whole lot of triangulation that I'm not even going to touch on this blog because that's a whole other blog.  I was told that because I had set out the roses for the confirmands on Sunday (because I had to set out their certificates, stoles, robes, and other gifts from the congregation) and I had filled pitchers with water and put them in the refrigerator while I was waiting on people to drop off things to the church so we had cold water for a funeral reception, I was over stepping and had offended a member. This comes flying at me after I had people write formal letters of complaint to my denominations oversight group because I wrote thank you notes last fall to members who returned...